By contrast, Justice Breyer’s dissenting view embodied good purposivist method of interpreting this new statute
154 He figured the newest disputed title “costs” can be interpreted “to add the new award regarding pro costs” for 2 explanations: “Very first, that’s what Congress said they created of the terminology. 2nd, one interpretation furthers the newest [Act’s] statutorily laid out objectives.” 155 Justice Breyer used brand new bill’s legislative background plus the Act’s “first objective”-to make sure that youngsters that have disabilities receive quality societal degree-since first proof of this new statute’s meaning. 156 He didn’t concur that this new statute’s text try unambiguous. 157 Even when he indexed you to definitely an exact training of one’s supply won’t authorize the expense sought because of the moms and dads, the guy concluded that that it training is actually “not inescapable.” 158 Rather, the guy concluded that their reading, “if you are linguistically the fresh new smaller pure, is actually legislatively the much more likely.” 159
(đọc thêm)